From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re: |
Date: | 2006-07-18 19:20:40 |
Message-ID: | 200607181920.k6IJKeI16481@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Good, added to pginclude/README:
Also, tests should be done with configure settings of --enable-cassert
and EXEC_BACKEND on and off.
I think we had more problems this time just because our code is more
complex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > FYI, 527 include were removed from non-header C files in this run. That
> > is not something that can be easily done manually.
>
> It's not so easily done automatically, either :-(. I'm not sure why
> this go-round was so much more painful than the last, but it very
> clearly exposed the deficiencies in your testing process. Mainly,
> that you tested only one set of configure options on one platform.
>
> I would say that minimum requirements for doing this again in future
> are (1) test with and without --enable-cassert, and (2) test with and
> without EXEC_BACKEND. We *know* that both those things change the
> set of headers required. It might be necessary to actually test the
> WIN32 port separately --- EXEC_BACKEND is close but not the same.
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-18 19:46:32 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-07-18 19:09:09 | Re: url for TODO item, is it right? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-07-18 19:46:32 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2006-07-18 18:49:35 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |