Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs.

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs.
Date: 2003-10-09 15:43:44
Message-ID: 60n0ca8lhr.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org ("Marc G. Fournier") writes:
> my personal question is how well any of this would even stand up in
> a court of law, or how would you enforce it?

If you get a threatening letter in the mail with all sorts of legal
verbiage such that you have to pay for a lawyer to interpret it,
that's going to cause a bunch of Loss of Sleep, Fear, Uncertainty, and
Doubt.

And consider: with the separation of duties, what is likely to happen
in many places is that the letter is likely to go to the corporate
Legal Department who will get all flustered and paranoid, and call
managers, who will also get all flustered and paranoid.

Paying "commercial licensing fees" will do a nice job of unflustering
them, albeit at the cost of demonstrating that it isn't "free
software" in any conceivable sense of the term...
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "libertyrms.info")
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-10-09 16:05:08 Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs.
Previous Message Jonathan Bartlett 2003-10-09 15:42:57 Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)