From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee> |
Cc: | John Wells <jb(at)sourceillustrated(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. |
Date: | 2003-10-09 14:58:33 |
Message-ID: | 20031009115806.N28590@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
my personal question is how well any of this would even stand up in a
court of law, or how would you enforce it?
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Kaarel wrote:
>
> >http://www.mysql.com/products/licensing-examples.html.
> >
> >
> Well this is very interesting indeed. Beat that:
>
> "You need a license if you sell a product designed specifically for use
> with MySQL or that requires the MySQL server to function at all. This is
> true whether or not you provide MySQL for your client as part of your
> product distribution."
>
> So whatever compiled program or script you sell, if it works only with
> MySQL (say you want to sell a shell script that checks if a row has been
> added to a MySQL table), you need a license. Then a question arises
> though, when I make my script to work with MySQL AND PostgreSQL too,
> does this make the above statement not valid in my case?
>
> Kaarel
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Marques | 2003-10-09 14:59:38 | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |
Previous Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-10-09 14:54:30 | Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing) |