| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extension Packaging |
| Date: | 2011-04-24 21:59:01 |
| Message-ID: | 60D048F2-76D1-4426-B358-A28B862AAA3F@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Apr 24, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm ... it's sufficient, but I think people are going to be confused as
> to proper usage if you call two different things the "version". In RPM
> terminology there's a clear difference between "version" and "release";
> maybe some similar wording should be adopted here? Or use "major
> version" versus "minor version"?
I could "distribution version" =~ s/version/release/; Frankly, the way the terminology is now it's halfway-there already.
So distribution semver release 1.1.0 might contain extension semver version 1.0.0.
Hrm, Still rather confusing.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2011-04-24 22:02:49 | Re: Extension Packaging |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-24 21:55:05 | Re: Extension Packaging |