| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Getting to beta1 |
| Date: | 2010-03-19 00:23:02 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071003181723taa987f3l7356545a89a2d76e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> If this is turning into a vote: -1 from me for any work on this until
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items is cleared. It
> boggles my mind that anyone could have a different prioritization right now.
This isn't about priority, at least in my mind. It's about consensus.
If we have consensus, the work can get done for 9.1. It seems like
everyone is on the same page - that is a good thing.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2010-03-19 06:19:27 | Re: An idle thought |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-03-19 00:01:27 | Re: Getting to beta1 |