| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Getting to beta1 |
| Date: | 2010-03-18 23:54:01 |
| Message-ID: | 4BA2BD19.8050601@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 10:18 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Or, let's put it another way: I've made my opinion clear in the past
>>>> that I think that we ought to ship with a minimal postgresql.conf with
>>>> maybe 15 items in it.
>>> +1
>>>
>> +1 ... but, why the 'top 15'? why not just those that are uncommented to
>> start with, and leave those that are commented out as 'in the docs' ... ?
>>
> +1 to either proposal.
>
If this is turning into a vote: -1 from me for any work on this until
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items is cleared.
It boggles my mind that anyone could have a different prioritization
right now.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.us
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-03-19 00:01:27 | Re: Getting to beta1 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-03-18 23:12:20 | Re: Getting to beta1 |