From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)siriusit(dot)co(dot)uk>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree |
Date: | 2010-02-03 16:47:15 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f071002030847q28422182kc3f86e4680ad8c04@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/2/3 Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>:
>>> I would like to see point #2 of the following email addressed before
>>> commit. As things stand, it is not clear (at least to me) whether
>>> this is a win.
>>>
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02552.php
>>
>> Specifically, on this web page:
>>
>> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/2009-04-03
>>
>> There is a section that begins with this line of text:
>>
>> Repeat test with 100,000 identical records varying array length (len).
>>
>> That test shows rbtree being a third slower than HEAD. But there's
>> not enough information on that web page to replicate that test, so
>> it's hard to speculate on what may be going wrong. I don't think we
>> should commit this until we understand that.
>
> Robert, Mark described the test he did
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php
So why did he get totally different answers than you?
It's not enough to say "somebody else did a test and got better
numbers than we did, so let's use theirs".
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2010-02-03 16:47:58 | Re: Review of Writeable CTE Patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-03 16:45:44 | CommitFest Status Summary - 2010-02-03 |