From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
Date: | 2009-12-17 14:16:59 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070912170616q4edca247qf49990550c148ad@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/12/17 Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> 2009/12/16 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>> >>>> ? ?long desc: When turned on, privilege checks on large objects perform with
>> >>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? backward compatibility as 8.4.x or earlier releases.
>
>> Mostly English quality, but there are some other issues too. Proposed
>> patch attached.
>
> I remember we had discussions about the version number, like
> "Don't use '8.5' because it might be released as '9.0'", no?
I chose to follow the style which Tom indicated that he preferred
here. We don't use the phrase "8.4.x series" anywhere else in the
documentation, so this doesn't seem like a good time to start. Tom or
I will go through and renumber everything if we end up renaming the
release to 9.0.
> Another comment is I'd like to keep <link linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject-metadata">
> for the first <structname>pg_largeobject</structname> in each topic.
Those two things aren't the same. Perhaps you meant <link
linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject">? I'll tweak the pg_largeobject and
pg_largeobject_metadata sections to make sure each has a link to the
other and commit this. I also found one more spelling mistake so I
will include that correction as well.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-17 14:35:39 | Re: NOT IN Doesn't use Anti Joins? |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2009-12-17 14:02:57 | NOT IN Doesn't use Anti Joins? |