Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2009-12-18 00:27:51
Message-ID: 20091218092751.9252.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > Another comment is I'd like to keep <link linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject-metadata">
> > for the first <structname>pg_largeobject</structname> in each topic.
>
> Those two things aren't the same. Perhaps you meant <link
> linkend="catalog-pg-largeobject">?

Oops, yes. Thank you for the correction.

We also have "8.4.x series" in the core code. Do you think we also
rewrite those messages? One of them is an use-visible message.

LargeObjectAlterOwner() : pg_largeobject.c
* The 'lo_compat_privileges' is not checked here, because we
* don't have any access control features in the 8.4.x series
* or earlier release.
* So, it is not a place we can define a compatible behavior.

guc.c
{"lo_compat_privileges", PGC_SUSET, COMPAT_OPTIONS_PREVIOUS,
gettext_noop("Enables backward compatibility in privilege checks on large objects"),
gettext_noop("When turned on, privilege checks on large objects perform "
"with backward compatibility as 8.4.x or earlier releases.")

Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-18 01:57:38 Re: patch - per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-12-18 00:20:02 Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement