From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |
Date: | 2009-08-10 16:39:00 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070908100939i7ef9f4aet4a92c5930f8bf5f5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> <Filter><Expr><Text>(f1 > 0)</Text></Expr></Filter>
>>>
>>> This would leave room to add additional properties beside the text,
>>> and not break existing clients when we do it.
>
>> Well, there you seem to be adding TWO containers, which is probably
>> overkill. I could see adding one.
>
> Uh, no, I see one container and a property. If we do just
>
> <Filter><Expr>(f1 > 0)</Expr></Filter>
>
> then where do we put additional information about the expression
> when the time comes?
I would assume you would just write:
<Filter><Text>(f1 > 0)</Text><Other-Stuff>thing!</Other-Stuff></Filter>
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-10 16:47:37 | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-10 16:33:24 | Re: Segmentation fault when using a set-returning C function from a view in 8.4.0 |