From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |
Date: | 2009-08-10 16:47:37 |
Message-ID: | 12204.1249922857@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Uh, no, I see one container and a property. If we do just
>>
>> <Filter><Expr>(f1 > 0)</Expr></Filter>
>>
>> then where do we put additional information about the expression
>> when the time comes?
> I would assume you would just write:
> <Filter><Text>(f1 > 0)</Text><Other-Stuff>thing!</Other-Stuff></Filter>
Perhaps the issue would be clearer in JSON notation. We have
"Filter": "(f1 > 0)"
What I suggest is
"Filter": { "Text": "(f1 > 0)" }
I don't see where you're going to shoehorn in any additional information
without the container, and once you have the container you need to name
the property, no?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-08-10 16:54:23 | Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-10 16:39:00 | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |