| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-10 14:30:21 |
| Message-ID: | 5d6f6f93d91674f9aaa6c6b83cf0d25b@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Stupid question, but what does MySQL bring to the equation? Why
> not just use PostgreSQL in the first place?
A good question. I think one answer is the MySQL name. Many open-source
advocates seem enamored of MySQL, but you can never pin them down about
exactly what it is they love so much about it. Maybe we can rebrand
PG as "MiSQL" or something. :)
The other answer may be the license: plugging PG into the MySQL system
(which is about as technically feasible trying to breed a porpoise
and an elephant) keeps MySQL GPL, which is another reason many people
like it.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200510101028
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFDSnrqvJuQZxSWSsgRAj7lAJ96I0TGpeOTFSkR91J8FLLIjU2ekgCgsM7C
DfI6bse1MVYUVrW9uGl69hM=
=ose4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Pradier | 2005-10-10 14:44:54 | Is a primary key made of a couple columns so much better than a unique() constraint ? |
| Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2005-10-10 14:23:53 | strange error |