Re: Oracle buys Innobase

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-10 03:31:09
Message-ID: 20051010003042.B1477@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Stupid question, but what does MySQL bring to the equation? Why not just
use PostgreSQL in the first place?

On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, CSN wrote:

> Look what somebody suggested!
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> If the worst happens and Oracle tries to squash
> InnoDB, there may already be such an alternative out
> there.
>
> I wonder what it would take to add (and optimize)
> Postgres storage engine support to MySQL? I don't know
> exactly how current versions of MySQL and Postgres
> maesure up performance-wise, but PgSQL seems to have
> made steady progress on performance improvements.
>
> Maybe this is a crazy idea, I don't know how
> technically or legally feasible it is, but I really
> like the idea of the two open-source communities
> uniting to battle Oracle.
>
> http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/005490.html#comment-21233
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CSN 2005-10-10 03:38:14 Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Miles Keaton 2005-10-10 03:25:31 Re: brain-teaser with CONSTRAINT - any SQL experts?