From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What to watch out for when ALTERing NUMERIC(38,0) to BIGINT? |
Date: | 2022-07-28 17:41:41 |
Message-ID: | 5a747f00-02dc-3922-6506-fef8ccd701bf@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On 7/28/22 10:26, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 8:13 AM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Besides what's mentioned in
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/ddl-alter.html#id-1.5.4.8.10, what
>>> happens *internally* when I run:
>>> ALTER TABLE foo ALTER COLUMN bar TYPE BIGINT;
>> IIUC, that would be the silver lining in all of this - the rewritten table
>> would have zero fragmentation and bloat.
> Yeah. What happens internally is a table rewrite: the entire content
> of the table (and its indexes) is written into a new set of files.
> At commit, the old files are deleted. The main gotchas, for a large
> table, are the transient disk space consumption and the fact that the
> table stays exclusively locked the whole time.
Rewriting a 3TB table doesn't seem appetizing. Fortunately, there's only
one table like that...
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Debraj Manna | 2022-07-29 06:19:55 | Postgres Updating only changed columns against entire row |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-28 15:26:39 | Re: What to watch out for when ALTERing NUMERIC(38,0) to BIGINT? |