Re: What to watch out for when ALTERing NUMERIC(38,0) to BIGINT?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What to watch out for when ALTERing NUMERIC(38,0) to BIGINT?
Date: 2022-07-28 15:26:39
Message-ID: 3421791.1659021999@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 8:13 AM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Besides what's mentioned in
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/ddl-alter.html#id-1.5.4.8.10, what
>> happens *internally* when I run:
>> ALTER TABLE foo ALTER COLUMN bar TYPE BIGINT;

> IIUC, that would be the silver lining in all of this - the rewritten table
> would have zero fragmentation and bloat.

Yeah. What happens internally is a table rewrite: the entire content
of the table (and its indexes) is written into a new set of files.
At commit, the old files are deleted. The main gotchas, for a large
table, are the transient disk space consumption and the fact that the
table stays exclusively locked the whole time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2022-07-28 17:41:41 Re: What to watch out for when ALTERing NUMERIC(38,0) to BIGINT?
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-07-28 15:19:38 Re: What to watch out for when ALTERing NUMERIC(38,0) to BIGINT?