Re: SCRAM authentication, take three

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,magnus(at)hagander(dot)net,robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: SCRAM authentication, take three
Date: 2017-04-16 05:36:24
Message-ID: 5BF1DBA6-D5E5-4679-8C4B-439C144DB3FE@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16 April 2017 07:14:21 EEST, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.
>Kindly send
>a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
>status
>update.

I will pick this up on Tuesday. The consensus seems to be to change the option to "scram-sha-256", so I'll do that.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2017-04-16 06:03:32 Re: pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-04-16 05:35:46 Re: logical replication launcher crash on buildfarm