| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw |
| Date: | 2018-01-18 07:16:35 |
| Message-ID: | 5A6049D3.4090102@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/01/17 22:00), Stephen Frost wrote:
> Reviewing this thread, I tend to agree with Etsuro and I'm not sure I
> see where there's a good argument for having a foreign table under a
> view behave differently than a local table under a view for WCO (which
> is an option of the view- not about the table underneath it or if it's
> local or remote). I've not done a detailed review of the patch but it
> seems pretty reasonable and pretty small.
Thanks for the comments!
I noticed the patch doesn't apply. Attached is a rebased patch.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fix-wco-handling-in-postgres-fdw-v2.patch | text/x-diff | 18.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-01-18 07:18:31 | Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-18 06:47:46 | Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10 |