Re: an enhancement idea

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: an enhancement idea
Date: 2010-12-05 21:07:41
Message-ID: 596.1291583261@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> writes:
> On 12/05/10 12:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you want that level of isolation, you have to give each user his own
>> cluster.

> as postgresql is currently structured, yes, and further, each cluster
> needs its own listener port which is, IMHO, rather ugly.

The amount of work needed to get rid of that small bit of ugliness seems
far out of proportion to the value.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2010-12-05 21:27:59 Re: an enhancement idea
Previous Message John R Pierce 2010-12-05 20:41:54 Re: an enhancement idea