From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: an enhancement idea |
Date: | 2010-12-05 21:27:59 |
Message-ID: | 4CFC03DF.70606@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>> If you want that level of isolation, you have to give each user his own
>>> cluster.
>> as postgresql is currently structured, yes, and further, each cluster
>> needs its own listener port which is, IMHO, rather ugly.
> The amount of work needed to get rid of that small bit of ugliness seems
> far out of proportion to the value.
With the current architecture, you would need to develop service
management that could potentially handle 100s of clusters, in a shared
web host sort of environment. I sure wouldn't want to have to manage
100s of sysV /etc/rc3.d kinda services to launch all these postmasters,
ugh. As I'm envisioning it, the user management would be in the master
cluster, child cluster/instances would not have their own users.
yeah, I suppose this is pointless. ah well, after a couple beers last
night, it seemed like a fantastic idea :D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-12-05 23:00:39 | Re: One-click Installers for 9.1 Alpha 2 (ETA) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-05 21:07:41 | Re: an enhancement idea |