From: | "Haron, Charles" <charles(dot)haron(at)cognitive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Geoffrey' <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |
Date: | 2003-11-04 18:55:31 |
Message-ID: | 593E515C9586D511BB4500010283D5E24396@COG-MAIL |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Not only will you have performance and corruption issues, you'll also have
problems with the lock file. And security is a pain to manage. We have
replaced all of our multi-user Access databases with PostgreSQL.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoffrey [mailto:esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:46 AM
> To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [ADMIN] Microsoft access verses postgresql
>
>
> I've got a client who is following my suggestion that they
> replace a set
> of excel spreadsheets with a database solution. They are
> looking at two
> proposals, postgresql solution or an Access solution. The
> requirements
> will include vpn connectivity from one site to another. It
> appears they
> will be going with the Access solution. I've got concerns regarding
> this based on research I've done that seems to indicate that Access,
> when used in a multi-user solution is easily corrupted. Does anyone
> have any knowledge/experience with such issues?
>
> --
> Until later, Geoffrey esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net
>
> Building secure systems inspite of Microsoft
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
> majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-11-04 20:55:13 | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |
Previous Message | William Yu | 2003-11-04 18:47:02 | Re: Microsoft access verses postgresql |