Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comment on GatherPath.single_copy
Date: 2016-08-31 11:26:22
Message-ID: 5934.1472642782@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert, could you fix the documentation for that field so it's
>> intelligible?

> Uh, maybe. The trick, as you've already noted, is finding something
> better. Maybe this:

> - bool single_copy; /* path must not be executed >1x */
> + bool single_copy; /* don't execute path in multiple processes */

OK by me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-31 11:32:11 Re: GIN logging GIN_SEGMENT_UNMODIFIED actions?
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2016-08-31 10:59:22 Re: Exclude schema during pg_restore