From: | vhikida(at)inreach(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joost Kraaijeveld" <j(dot)kraaijeveld(at)askesis(dot)nl>, vhikida(at)inreach(dot)com, "Pgsql-General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query, view join question. |
Date: | 2005-01-06 19:47:52 |
Message-ID: | 59009.146.74.1.99.1105040872.squirrel@146.74.1.99 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I think there is an echo in here :) It's probably me. I pass for the rest
of this thread.
> "Joost Kraaijeveld" <J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl> writes:
>> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW even AS
>> SELECT DISTINCT abo_his.klantnummer,
>>> abo_his.artikelnummer, abo_his.code_retour,
>>> abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen, abo_klt.afgewerkt
>> FROM abo_his
>> JOIN abo_klt ON abo_his.klantnummer = abo_klt.klantnummer
>> WHERE abo_his.abonnement = 238
>> ORDER BY abo_his.klantnummer, abo_his.artikelnummer,
>>> abo_his.code_retour, abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen, abo_klt.afgewerkt;
>
>> In the table abo_klt there is no record where abo_klt.abonnement = 238
>> and abo_klt.afgewerkt > 0:
>
>> munt=# select * from abo_klt where abonnement = 238 and afgewerkt > 0;
>
> Yes, but the join isn't testing abo_klt.abonnement. It's testing
> abo_his.abonnement. If there's a reason to think that rows in the two
> tables with the same klantnummer must also have the same abonnement,
> you have not said what it is.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric Brown | 2005-01-06 19:51:09 | Re: Editor: Syntax highlighting and stored procedures surrounded by ' |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-01-06 19:43:08 | Re: Editor: Syntax highlighting and stored procedures surrounded |