Re: pg_starttime()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Matthias Schmidt <schmidtm(at)mock-software(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_starttime()
Date: 2005-06-06 16:34:39
Message-ID: 5832.1118075679@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>> I'd also propose to name this function pg_postmaster_starttime() to
>> clarify its purpose.

> Agreed, or pg_server_start_time()? Which is better?

It's not instantly obvious whether "server" means the postmaster or the
current backend process, so I'd vote with Andreas on this. But I also
like start_time better than starttime ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-06 16:44:23 Re: pg_starttime()
Previous Message Markus Bertheau ☭ 2005-06-06 16:12:46 Re: [SQL] ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[]