| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Matthias Schmidt <schmidtm(at)mock-software(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_starttime() |
| Date: | 2005-06-06 16:44:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200506061644.j56GiNe25892@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >> I'd also propose to name this function pg_postmaster_starttime() to
> >> clarify its purpose.
>
> > Agreed, or pg_server_start_time()? Which is better?
>
> It's not instantly obvious whether "server" means the postmaster or the
> current backend process, so I'd vote with Andreas on this. But I also
> like start_time better than starttime ...
Yea, I agree on both.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2005-06-06 17:33:37 | Re: uptime function to postmaster |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-06 16:34:39 | Re: pg_starttime() |