Re: WAL fsync scheduling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Date: 2000-11-18 18:08:30
Message-ID: 5776.974570910@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> how about sigpause, and using SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to wake them up ?

> Looks like a winner.

sigpause() is a BSD-ism, and not part of any recognized standard
according to my HP man pages. How portable do you think it is?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-18 18:16:02 Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-11-18 18:07:00 Re: WAL fsync scheduling