Re: WAL fsync scheduling

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Date: 2000-11-18 18:16:02
Message-ID: 200011181816.NAA27561@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >>>>> how about sigpause, and using SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to wake them up ?
>
> > The standard is sigsuspend:
>
> OK, we can probably assume that at least one of sigsuspend or sigpause
> is available everywhere. Now all you need is a free signal number.
> Unfortunately we're already using both SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2.

Oh, I didn't want to hear that one.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-18 18:19:32 Re: WAL fsync scheduling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-18 18:08:30 Re: WAL fsync scheduling