Re: 10.0

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 18:50:56
Message-ID: 57362210.2010106@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/13/2016 08:19 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > Thoughts? Is it crazy to go from 9.6beta1 to 10.0beta2? What would
>> > actually be involved in making the change?
> Someone mentioned how Postgres 8.5 became 9.0, but then someone else
> said the change was made during alpha releases, not beta. Can someone
> dig up the details?

/me digs through the announcement archives ...

We changed it to 9.0 for Alpha4. By Beta1, it was already 9.0.

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 15:19:12 from Bruce Momjian

Responses

  • Re: 10.0 at 2016-05-13 19:00:34 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-13 19:00:34 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2016-05-13 18:50:53 Re: 10.0