| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 19:00:34 |
| Message-ID: | 13941.1463166034@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 05/13/2016 08:19 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Someone mentioned how Postgres 8.5 became 9.0, but then someone else
>> said the change was made during alpha releases, not beta. Can someone
>> dig up the details?
> /me digs through the announcement archives ...
> We changed it to 9.0 for Alpha4. By Beta1, it was already 9.0.
Yeah, I'd come to the same conclusion by checking the git history.
7.0 and 8.0 were also rebranded that way in advance of any beta
releases.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-05-13 19:03:14 | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2016-05-13 18:50:56 | Re: 10.0 |