| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: When should be advocate external projects? |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 18:01:27 |
| Message-ID: | 57361677.2050309@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/13/2016 06:04 AM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> On 13-05-2016 02:31, Josh berkus wrote:
>> That's the reason why I was in favor of doing a "please test this" in
>> the announcement. However, we ran out of time for discussion of that,
>> and omitting it was the default choice without consensus.
>>
> Why not a separate announce? "It is not in core" that was the most used
> argument. Instead, let's polish it and do a separate announce saying
> that it is target for 9.6+ and explain that we expect to incorporate
> that code in the next version.
>
>
Well, I was planning on that too, but 2Q did their own announcement.
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-05-13 18:05:37 | Re: 9.6Beta1 Released (Where advocated) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-05-13 17:59:47 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |