Re: When should be advocate external projects?

From: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Date: 2016-05-13 13:04:50
Message-ID: 5735D0F2.4060202@timbira.com.br
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 13-05-2016 02:31, Josh berkus wrote:
> That's the reason why I was in favor of doing a "please test this" in
> the announcement. However, we ran out of time for discussion of that,
> and omitting it was the default choice without consensus.
>
Why not a separate announce? "It is not in core" that was the most used
argument. Instead, let's polish it and do a separate announce saying
that it is target for 9.6+ and explain that we expect to incorporate
that code in the next version.

--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2016-05-13 13:21:49 Re: New versioning scheme
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2016-05-13 12:56:18 Re: New versioning scheme