| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Date: | 2016-05-09 22:55:43 |
| Message-ID: | 5731156F.8060706@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/09/2016 03:39 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 09/05/16 22:38, Josh berkus wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 01:24 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any interest in us making packages for beta1? (We have packages
>>> for 9.4 and 9.5 so far)
>>>
>>
>> I'd say thats a prerequiste to announcing pglogical in the beta
>> announcement ...
>>
>
> Okay, that should not be a problem (provided that debs and rpms are
> enough). But would be good to get early access to pgdg beta1 packages
> then so that we can build pglogical against them in time. I admit I have
> not much idea of how the release packaging is coordinated.
I think we've left this until too late. Sorry about that.
Let's maybe plan on announcing pglogical next week from pgCon? Will you
or Craig be there?
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-05-09 23:00:01 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2016-05-09 22:53:37 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |