Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Date: 2016-05-09 22:39:45
Message-ID: 573111B1.4070705@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 09/05/16 22:38, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 01:24 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>
>> Is there any interest in us making packages for beta1? (We have packages
>> for 9.4 and 9.5 so far)
>>
>
> I'd say thats a prerequiste to announcing pglogical in the beta
> announcement ...
>

Okay, that should not be a problem (provided that debs and rpms are
enough). But would be good to get early access to pgdg beta1 packages
then so that we can build pglogical against them in time. I admit I have
not much idea of how the release packaging is coordinated.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-09 22:46:20 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Josh berkus 2016-05-09 22:24:02 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0