| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-09 21:00:38 |
| Message-ID: | 5730FA76.2020509@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/09/2016 01:58 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> So this is probably just highlighting how I'm not up to date on the
> -advocacy discussion :) But I thought the idea was to have it
> integrated, and that *that* was "the product" in this case. As in the
> "breaker that makes it possible to do transparent upgrades without
> external products". Which I thought was the target for next release, not
> this release. But I may be confusing multiple discussion, and as such
> contributing to the confusion.
Yeah, there's multiple discussions, at least 2:
1. Should we promote pglogical in the beta as something to *test*?
2. Is pglogical a major-version-making feature?
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gilberto Castillo | 2016-05-09 21:04:59 | Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-05-09 20:58:57 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |