From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
Date: | 2016-05-09 20:24:25 |
Message-ID: | 5730F1F9.5010000@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi Josh,
On 09/05/16 18:53, Josh berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm wondering whether or not we should be promoting pglogical with the
> release as an external extension. Here's what that would hinge on:
>
> 1. is it easily installable as an external extension? if so, where can
> people download it?
Yes with debs and rpms + sources tarball as well for other systems. The
project page is on 2ndQ website (
http://2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/ ) at the moment, not sure
if that's issue for community. The absolutely bare bones download page
is at http://packages.2ndquadrant.com/pglogical/ .
>
> 2. are the issues raised on -hackers likely to be resolved by September?
>
Well afaik the the issues reported on -hackers are fixed in 1.1 which
was released last week (unless I missed some). So in terms of extension
it should be fine.
> 3. is it ready for playing with now? can people get as far as test
> setups with it?
>
Sure, there are people testing it for production usage, the regression
tests have about 96% function coverage, etc. The 1.1 tarball builds fine
with current head so will work with beta1 as well I assume.
Is there any interest in us making packages for beta1? (We have packages
for 9.4 and 9.5 so far)
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-05-09 20:24:37 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-05-09 18:26:00 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |