Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Date: 2016-05-09 20:24:25
Message-ID: 5730F1F9.5010000@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hi Josh,

On 09/05/16 18:53, Josh berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm wondering whether or not we should be promoting pglogical with the
> release as an external extension. Here's what that would hinge on:
>
> 1. is it easily installable as an external extension? if so, where can
> people download it?

Yes with debs and rpms + sources tarball as well for other systems. The
project page is on 2ndQ website (
http://2ndquadrant.com/en/resources/pglogical/ ) at the moment, not sure
if that's issue for community. The absolutely bare bones download page
is at http://packages.2ndquadrant.com/pglogical/ .

>
> 2. are the issues raised on -hackers likely to be resolved by September?
>

Well afaik the the issues reported on -hackers are fixed in 1.1 which
was released last week (unless I missed some). So in terms of extension
it should be fine.

> 3. is it ready for playing with now? can people get as far as test
> setups with it?
>

Sure, there are people testing it for production usage, the regression
tests have about 96% function coverage, etc. The 1.1 tarball builds fine
with current head so will work with beta1 as well I assume.

Is there any interest in us making packages for beta1? (We have packages
for 9.4 and 9.5 so far)

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-05-09 20:24:37 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-05-09 18:26:00 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0