Re: Reviewing freeze map code

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Date: 2016-05-06 21:10:04
Message-ID: 572D082C.3050704@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/06/2016 02:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote:

> It bothers me more than it probably should: Nobdy tests, reviews,
> whatever a complex patch with significant data-loss potential. But as
> soon somebody dares to mention an option name...

Definitely more than it should, because it's gonna happen *every* time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_triviality

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-05-06 21:12:54 Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-05-06 21:08:16 Re: Reviewing freeze map code