Re: Reviewing freeze map code

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Date: 2016-05-06 21:12:54
Message-ID: 20160506211254.4rknrxpjzav7f66r@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-05-06 14:10:04 -0700, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 02:08 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > It bothers me more than it probably should: Nobdy tests, reviews,
> > whatever a complex patch with significant data-loss potential. But as
> > soon somebody dares to mention an option name...
>
> Definitely more than it should, because it's gonna happen *every* time.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_triviality

Doesn't mean it should not be frowned upon.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh berkus 2016-05-06 21:15:47 Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Previous Message Josh berkus 2016-05-06 21:10:04 Re: Reviewing freeze map code