| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
| Date: | 2016-05-06 21:01:34 |
| Message-ID: | 572D062E.5030308@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/06/2016 01:58 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-05-06 13:54:09 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 05/06/2016 01:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> There already is FREEZE - meaning something different - so I doubt it.
>>
>> Yeah I thought about that, it is the word "FORCE" that bothers me. When you
>> use FORCE there is an assumption that no matter what, it plows through
>> (think rm -f). So if we don't use FROZEN, that's cool but FORCE doesn't work
>> either.
>
> SCANALL?
>
VACUUM THEWHOLEDAMNTHING
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-05-06 21:03:11 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-05-06 21:00:59 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |