Re: Reviewing freeze map code

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Date: 2016-05-06 21:03:53
Message-ID: 20160506210353.GF10850@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Josh berkus (josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com) wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 01:58 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2016-05-06 13:54:09 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> On 05/06/2016 01:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> >>> There already is FREEZE - meaning something different - so I doubt it.
> >>
> >> Yeah I thought about that, it is the word "FORCE" that bothers me. When you
> >> use FORCE there is an assumption that no matter what, it plows through
> >> (think rm -f). So if we don't use FROZEN, that's cool but FORCE doesn't work
> >> either.
> >
> > SCANALL?
> >
>
> VACUUM THEWHOLEDAMNTHING

+100

(hahahaha)

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2016-05-06 21:06:33 Re: atomic pin/unpin causing errors
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-05-06 21:03:11 Re: Reviewing freeze map code