From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |
Date: | 2016-04-24 19:23:59 |
Message-ID: | 571D1D4F.30800@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/24/2016 03:16 PM, Christian Ullrich wrote:
> * Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> On 04/24/2016 12:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>>> OK, here's my final version of the patch, which I will apply in 24
>>>> hours
>>>> or so unless there is an objection.
>
>>> BTW, in view of 9f633b404, shouldn't there be a similar addition to
>>> win32env.c in this patch?
>
>> msvcr120.dll seems to be the highest numbered one on my system, and we
>> already cover that. If you like we can add to the comments in that file.
>
> There won't be a higher one, with VS 2015, CRT became a system
> component, namely, UCRT. However, ucrtbase.dll does export putenv, so
> it might need to be added.
>
OK. Does that mean we won't have to add anything more for future VS
releases?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-24 19:27:26 | Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency |
Previous Message | Christian Ullrich | 2016-04-24 19:16:47 | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |