From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Pyhalov <alp(at)rsu(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgpool-II: cannot use serializable mode in a hot standby |
Date: | 2016-04-12 14:17:51 |
Message-ID: | 570D038F.6020108@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 04/12/2016 07:02 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> On 04/12/2016 16:50, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 04/12/2016 01:06 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> We have application which explicitly does
>>> set default_transaction_isolation to 'serializable' .
>>> It is connected to PostgreSQL master/slave cluster through pgpool-II
>>> (pgpool2 3.4.3-1.pgdg70+1). Our logs are filling with
>>>
>>> ERROR: 0A000: cannot use serializable mode in a hot standby DETAIL:
>>> "default_transaction_isolation" is set to "serializable". HINT: You can
>>> use "SET default_transaction_isolation = 'repeatable read'" to change
>>> the default. db netstat, client 10.160.1.38, user nf2pg LOCATION:
>>> GetSerializableTransactionSnapshot, predicate.c:1588 STATEMENT:
>>> DISCARD ALL
>>>
>>> It seems pgpool sends these statements to the slave server. Is it
>>> pgpool/application misconfiguration or pgpool issue?
>>>
>>
>> I would say the above is coming from Postgres not pgpool:
>
> I understand. I mean perhaps pgpool shouldn't forward these statements
> to slaves.
>
That is probably best handled here:
http://www.pgpool.net/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
or here:
http://pgpool.net/mediawiki/index.php/Bug_tracking_system
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Edson Richter | 2016-04-12 14:25:04 | Fastest way to duplicate a quite large database |
Previous Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2016-04-12 14:02:49 | Re: pgpool-II: cannot use serializable mode in a hot standby |