From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)postgresql(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Brewer <mbrewer(at)postgresql(dot)us>, Debra Cerda <Debra(dot)Cerda(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Better booth blurb for OSCon |
Date: | 2016-04-06 01:18:43 |
Message-ID: | 570463F3.4070304@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/05/2016 05:55 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 4/5/16 7:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, it is backward. Let's try this:
>>
>> " With over 20 years of active and mature development, PostgreSQL is the
>> proven database architecture that has earned a strong reputation for
>> reliability, data integrity, and correctness. The world's most advanced
>> database, it is a scalable, extensible, and the open source solution to
>> your RDMS needs. "
>
> s/is a scalable/is scalable/
Yep, looks good.
>
>>>
>>> BTW, the blurb is word limited... currently 56 more words we can use. :)
>
> Since we have space left, maybe we should somehow mention "We do NoSQL
> too"?
We could but if we are going to do that...
With over 20 years of active and mature development, PostgreSQL is the
proven database architecture that has earned a strong reputation for
reliability, data integrity, and correctness.
The world's most advanced database, it is a scalable, extensible, and
100% open source. Whether it is a traditional normalized structure or
document database features (NoSQL), there is no database that provides
the extensibility of PostgreSQL, it offers the features and stability
your organization needs.
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-04-06 01:21:41 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-04-06 01:03:13 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |