Re: Better booth blurb for OSCon

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)postgresql(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Brewer <mbrewer(at)postgresql(dot)us>, Debra Cerda <Debra(dot)Cerda(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Better booth blurb for OSCon
Date: 2016-04-06 01:18:43
Message-ID: 570463F3.4070304@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 04/05/2016 05:55 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 4/5/16 7:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, it is backward. Let's try this:
>>
>> " With over 20 years of active and mature development, PostgreSQL is the
>> proven database architecture that has earned a strong reputation for
>> reliability, data integrity, and correctness. The world's most advanced
>> database, it is a scalable, extensible, and the open source solution to
>> your RDMS needs. "
>
> s/is a scalable/is scalable/

Yep, looks good.

>
>>>
>>> BTW, the blurb is word limited... currently 56 more words we can use. :)
>
> Since we have space left, maybe we should somehow mention "We do NoSQL
> too"?

We could but if we are going to do that...

With over 20 years of active and mature development, PostgreSQL is the
proven database architecture that has earned a strong reputation for
reliability, data integrity, and correctness.

The world's most advanced database, it is a scalable, extensible, and
100% open source. Whether it is a traditional normalized structure or
document database features (NoSQL), there is no database that provides
the extensibility of PostgreSQL, it offers the features and stability
your organization needs.

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-04-06 01:21:41 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-04-06 01:03:13 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0