From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: So, can we stop supporting Windows native now? |
Date: | 2016-03-31 15:44:35 |
Message-ID: | 56FD45E3.7030107@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/30/2016 09:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 31 March 2016 at 07:49, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> So, can we stop supporting Windows native now?
>
>> Why would we want to?
>
>> The cost is small.
>
> Surely you jest. Windows is the single biggest PITA platform from a
> portability perspective, and has been in every release cycle since we
> first had a Windows port, and there is no close second.
Add to that the cost on extension authors. I would surely *love* to dump
Windows support in PL/R as it is a major league PITA. It is probably an
understatement to say that over the last 10+ years, 95+% of the time I
have spent maintaining and supporting PL/R has been directly
attributable to the Windows port.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-03-31 15:44:46 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-03-31 15:29:37 | Re: WIP: Access method extendability |