From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Releasing in September |
Date: | 2016-01-20 17:42:28 |
Message-ID: | 569FC704.4000907@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/20/2016 09:31 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> I think one thing we should work on, is being absolutely religious about
>> requiring, say, 2 reviews for every nontrivial contribution. We
>> currently seem to have a significantly increased submission rate, and at
>> the same time the number of reviews per patch has gone down
>> substantially. I think the "honor" system has failed in that regard.
>
> Good point, totally agree.
>
> So the project should try to think of new ideas on how to incentivise reviewing?
>
> I have three ideas so far:
4. Submit a patch, review a patch.
Don't review patches? Don't submit patches.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-01-20 17:48:18 | Re: Releasing in September |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-20 17:40:04 | Re: Releasing in September |