| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Date: | 2010-04-25 17:51:00 |
| Message-ID: | 5699.1272217860@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 13:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you like I'll have a go at rewriting the comments for this patch,
>> because I am currently thinking that the problem is not so much with
>> the code as with the poor explanation of what it's doing. Sometimes
>> the author is too close to the code to understand why other people
>> have a hard time understanding it.
> That would help me, thank you.
OK. You said you were currently working some more on the patch, so
I'll wait for v3 and then work on it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-04-25 18:25:16 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-25 17:45:02 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |