Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date: 2010-04-25 17:45:02
Message-ID: 1272217502.4161.1865.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 13:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> If you like I'll have a go at rewriting the comments for this patch,
> because I am currently thinking that the problem is not so much with
> the code as with the poor explanation of what it's doing. Sometimes
> the author is too close to the code to understand why other people
> have a hard time understanding it.

That would help me, thank you.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-25 17:51:00 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-25 17:33:24 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance