From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] Propaganda page |
Date: | 2015-12-09 17:04:02 |
Message-ID: | 56685F02.7000603@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
CC'ing -advocacy because that seems to be actually relevant to that list...
On 12/09/2015 04:06 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 01:44 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> Josh - can you shed some light on what our currently maintained source
>> for that data is?
>
> We started setting up a file source instead of the git server, but I
> don't remember what happened with that. I think the task got
> sidetracked as a low priority.
>
> Maybe we need a pg.org S3 repo I can push stuff to?
so from a postgresql.org advocacy and website perspective we currently
have the following three "sources" for our graphics, logos and related
stuff:
* a pgfoundry project on http://pgfoundry.org/projects/graphics/ -
Status: outdated, incomplete, unmaintained and unreliable
* a repo on git.postgresql.org - Status: outdated, incomplete snd
unmaintained
* a "file source" - Status: unknown
Is it just me or that situation does not strike me as "low priority" -
but more of an important matter to be solved rather sooner than later?
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-12-09 17:27:49 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Propaganda page |
Previous Message | damien | 2015-12-09 11:00:28 | MongoDB 3.2: Now Powered by PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-12-09 17:11:52 | Re: Approval of pgcharm git repo? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-12-09 03:14:15 | Re: Propaganda page |