From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm |
Date: | 2024-04-04 15:19:11 |
Message-ID: | 562618.1712243951@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> writes:
>> That is not the concern here. What I think Peter is worried about,
>> and certainly what I'm worried about, is that a breakage in
>> SanityCheck comprehensively breaks all CI testing for all Postgres
>> developers.
> You'd have to commit a failing patch first to break CI for all other
> developers.
No, what I'm more worried about is some change in the environment
causing the build to start failing. When that happens, it'd better
be an environment that many of us are familiar with and can test/fix.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wolfgang Walther | 2024-04-04 19:09:30 | Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm |
Previous Message | Wolfgang Walther | 2024-04-04 15:01:32 | Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-04-04 15:19:53 | Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+ |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-04 15:16:28 | Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser |