Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Date: 2024-04-04 15:16:28
Message-ID: 562157.1712243788@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I think you just need to follow the standard pattern:

Yeah, the attached is enough to silence it for me.
(But personally I'd add comments saying that the typedef
appears in thus-and-such header file; see examples in
our tree.)

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
avoid-duplicate-typedefs.patch text/x-diff 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-04-04 15:19:11 Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm
Previous Message Wolfgang Walther 2024-04-04 15:01:32 Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm