From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Steve Howe" <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Large queries - again... |
Date: | 2001-07-20 23:08:27 |
Message-ID: | 5626.995670507@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Steve Howe" <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
>> (Thinks for awhile...) You're not using PQsetnonblocking() are you,
>> by any chance?
> No, I'm not.
Drat, another perfectly good theory down the drain :-(.
Well, we're not going to find out anymore until we discover what the
error code actually is --- the "errno=0" bogosity isn't helping.
As Bruce mentioned, we did just commit a patch that #defines errno
as WSAGetLastError() on WIN32, so that you can get at least something
useful about socket errors. I'd suggest pulling the current CVS sources
(or a nightly snapshot tarball dated after today) and building libpq
from that. Then maybe we can learn more.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Myers | 2001-07-20 23:20:53 | Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) |
Previous Message | Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?= | 2001-07-20 23:05:46 | Re: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) |