From: | "Steve Howe" <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Large queries - again... |
Date: | 2001-07-20 21:46:26 |
Message-ID: | 008e01c11165$6d4a27b0$7e31b0c8@angla |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Steve Howe" <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Large queries - again...
> "Steve Howe" <howe(at)carcass(dot)dhs(dot)org> writes:
> > It returns "Error: pqReadData() -- read() failed: errno=0 No
error
> > " as expected when a nil pointer is returned.
>
> "As expected"? That's not what I'd expect, especially not for a
> behavior that's dependent on the size of an *outgoing* message.
It is expected, because it's the default message when a PQexec() query
returns NULL: pqReadData() will return nothing yet no error is signed.
Of course, the "really expected" would be a sucessfull exec :-)
> (Thinks for awhile...) You're not using PQsetnonblocking() are you,
> by any chance?
No, I'm not. Asynchronous libpq connections on Windows are still not
realiable (althought I read someone submitted a patch recently), so I'm
keeping synchronous queries for a while. I'm not also using any non-standard
functions; just plain PQconnectdb() and PQexec()...
Best Regards,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-07-20 22:16:58 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: [GENERAL] psql -l) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-20 21:14:44 | Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l) |